About Me

Name: Dwight Baker
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Interesting Thought of the Day

A lot of politicians say we need to amnesty for illegal immigrants because there are a lot of jobs Americans just won’t do. If that’s true, then we should stop handing out welfare checks, food stamps, and housing subsidies. A welfare state and a surplus of jobs Americans won’t do shouldn't co-exist.   If there are jobs Americans won’t do, you don’t bring in MORE people.  The law of supply and demand teaches you if you have less competition for those jobs, the pay for those jobs would go up.  The jobs politicians are talking about are the jobs Americans won’t do at the price illegal immigrants have driven them down to.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

NASA chief doubts global warming is front-burner issue

Concerning a story from  my local Houston Chronicle today

Let the countdown begin, or office pools, whichever you prefer: How long before there are demands he be fired?  God forbid we have an intellectual debate on the topic but the Warming Worshippers are dogmatic in their invented religion and want to cast out anyone who doesn't agree with them.  I always thought science was about finding the truth, no matter where it leads you, but this is another topic in which CERTAIN scientists have declared the case closed, no further discussion or study is needed.  Kind of like the church of centuries ago locking up the scientists who didn't agree with them.  Now the Environmentalist Church is doing the same.  Meteorologists who question human-induced Global Warming are being fired from TV stations and universities.

Our sun just happens to be in a very active stage right now, and don't forget MARS is warming, too.  So let's see.  Earth, poisoned by the existence of humans is warming, and Human-less Mars is warming too.  Common denominator?  THE SUN!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Outside The Wire

 Haven't posted in a while but I don't feel it necessary to constantly purge myself here.  I do have a life, you know.  But this was worthy of passing along.  If you're a professional blog-reader AND you support this war, you may want to check out this site, http://www.outsidethewire.com/.  Then click on "blog".  Ever wonder what the troops on the ground are saying and seeing?  Wonder no more.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Left's Iraq Muddle

Former Democratic senator from Nebraska, Bob Kerrey, offers a great article today in the Wall Street Journal outlining AGAIN....for what seems like the millionth time.....WHY we went to Iraq when we did. 

The Left's Iraq Muddle
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Historical Significance (warning, long post)

I received this via e-mail from a co-worker. If you're reading this blog, chances are you already know this and agree with it but you may stil learn something and gain even more perspective. Share it with all you can.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Some of you may not be old enough to remember that nearly every family in America was grossly affected by WW II. Most of you may not remember the rationing of meat, shoes, butter, gasoline, and sugar. No tires for our automobiles, and a speed limit of 35 miles an hour on the road, not to mention, no new automobiles. Read this and think about how we would react to being taken over by foreigners in 2007.

This is an essay; well thought out and presented by Raymond S. Kraft, a writer living in Northern California who has studied the Middle Eastern culture and religion. You can google his name and see that he is a real

person.

Historical Significance by Raymond S. Kraft

Sixty-three years ago, Nazi Germany had overrun almost all of Europe and hammered England to the verge of bankruptcy and defeat. The Nazis had sunk more than 400 British ships in their convoys between England and America taking food and war materials.

At that time the US was in an isolationist, pacifist mood, and most Americans wanted nothing to do with the European or the Asian war.

Then along came Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, and in outrage Congress unanimously declared war on Japan, and the following day on Germany, who had not yet attacked us. It was a dicey thing. We had few allies.

France was not an ally, as the Vichy government of France quickly aligned itself with its German occupiers. Germany was certainly not an ally, as Hitler was intent on setting up a Thousand Year Reich in Europe. Japan was not an ally, as it was well on its way to owning and controlling all of

Asia.


Together, Japan and German y had long-range plans of invading Canada and Mexico, as launching pads to get into the United States over our northern and southern borders, after they finished gaining control of Asia and Europe.

America's only allies then were England, Ireland, Scotland, Canada, Australia, and Russia. That was about it. All of Europe, from Norway to Italy (except Russia in the East) was already under the Nazi heel.

The US was certainly not prepared for war. The US had drastically downgraded most of its military forces after WW I because of the depression, so that at the outbreak of WW II, Army units were training with broomsticks

because they didn't have guns, and cars with "tank" painted on the doors because they didn't have real tanks. A huge chunk of our Navy had just been sunk or damaged at Pearl Harbor.

Britain had already gone bankrupt, saved only by the donation of $600 million in gold bullion in the Bank of England (that was actually the property of Belgium) given by Belgium to England to carry on the war when

Belgium was overrun by Hitler (a little known fact).


Actually, Belgium surrendered in one day, because it was unable to oppose the German invasion, and the Germans bombed Brussels into rubble the next day just to prove they could.

Britain had already been holding out for two years in the face of staggering losses and the near decimation of its Royal Air Force in the Battle of Britain, and was saved from being overrun by Germany only because Hitler

made the mistake of thinking the Brits were a relatively minor threat that could be dealt with later. Hitler, first turned his attention to Russia, in the late summer of 1940 at a time when England was on the verge of collapse.

Ironically, Russia saved America's butt by putting up a desperate fight for two years, until the US got geared up to begin hammering away at Germany.

Russia lost something like 24,000,000 people in the sieges of Stalingrad and Moscow alone . . . 90% of them from cold and starvation, mostly civilians, but also more than a 1,000,000 soldiers.

Had Russia surrendered, Hitler would have been able to focus his entire war effort against the Brits, then America. If that had happened, the Nazis could possibly have won the war.

All of this has been brought out to illustrate that turning points in history are often dicey things. Now, we find ourselves at another one of those key moments in history.

There is a very dangerous minority in Islam that either has, or wants, and may soon have, the ability to deliver small nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons, almost anywhere in the world.

The Jihadis, the militant Muslims, are basically Nazis in Kaffiyahs-they believe that Islam, a radically conservative form of Wahhabi Islam, should own and control the Middle East first, then Europe, then the world. To them, all who do not bow to their will of thinking should be killed,

enslaved, or subjugated. They want to finish the Holocaust, destroy Israel, and purge the world of Jews. This is their mantra. (goal)

There is also a civil war raging in the Middle East-for the most part not a hot war, but a war of ideas. Islam is having its Inquisition and its Reformation, but it is not yet known which side will win-the Inquisitors, or

the Reformationists.


If the Inquisition wins, then the Wahhabis, the Jihadis, will control the Middle East, the OPEC oil, and the US , European, and Asian economies.

The techno-industrial economies will be at the mercy of OPEC-not an OPEC dominated by the educated, rational Saudis of today, but an OPEC dominated by the Jihadis. Do you want gas in your car? Do you want heating oil next winter? Do you want the dollar to be worth anything? You had better hope the Jihad, the Muslim Inquisition, loses, and the Islamic Reformation wins.

If the Reformation movement wins, that is, the moderate Muslims who believe that Islam can respect and tolerate other religions, live in peace with the rest of the world, and move out of the 10th century into the 21st, then the troubles in the Middle East will eventually fade away. A moderate and

prosperous Middle East will emerge.

We have to help the Reformation win, and to do that we have to fight the Inquisition, i.e., the Wahhabi movement, the Jihad, Al Qaeda and the Islamic terrorist movements. We have to do it somewhere. We can't do it everywhere at once. We have created a focal point for the battle at a time and place

of our choosing . . . . . . . In Iraq. Not in New York, not in London , or Paris or Berlin , but in Iraq, where we are doing two important things.

(1) We deposed Saddam Hussein. Whether Saddam Hussein was directly involved in the 9/11 terrorist attack or not, it is undisputed that Saddam has been actively supporting the terrorist movement for decades; Saddam was a terrorist! Saddam was a weapon of mass destruction, responsible for the

deaths of probably more than a 1,000,000 Iraqis and 2,000,000 Iranians.

(2) We created a battle, a confrontation, a flash point, with Islamic terrorism in Iraq. We have focused the battle. We are killing bad people, and the ones we get there we won't have to be killed here. We also have a

good shot at creating a democratic, peaceful Iraq, which will be a catalyst for democratic change in the rest of the Middle East, and an outpost for a stabilizing American military presence in the Middle East for as long as it

is needed.

WW II, the war with the Japanese and German Nazis, really began with a "whimper" in 1928. It did not begin with Pearl Harbor. It began with the Japanese invasion of China. It was a war for fourteen years before the US joined it. It officially ended in 1945-a 17-year war-and was followed by another decade of US occupation in Germany and Japan to get those countries reconstructed and running on their own a gain . . . A 27 year war.

WW II cost the United States an amount equal to approximately a full year's GDP-adjusted for inflation, equal to about $12 trillion dollars. WW II cost America more than 400,000 soldiers killed in action and nearly 100,000 still missing in action.

The Iraq war has, so far, cost the United States about $160,000,000,000, which is roughly what the 9/11 terrorist attack cost New York. It has also cost about 3,000 American lives, which is roughly equivalent to lives that the Jihad killed (within the United States ) in the 9/11 terrorist attack.

The cost of not fighting and winning WW II would have been unimaginably greater-a world dominated by Japanese Imperialism and German Nazism.

This is not a 60-Minutes TV show, or a 2-hour movie in which everything comes out okay. The real world is not like that. It is messy, uncertain, and sometimes bloody and ugly. It always has been, and probably always will

be.


The bottom line is that we will have to deal with Islamic terrorism until we defeat it, whenever that is. It will not go away if we ignore it.

If the US can create a reasonably democratic and stable Iraq, then we have an ally, like England, in the Middle East, a platform, from which we can work to help modernize and moderate the Middle East. The history of the

world is the clash between the forces of relative civility and civilization, and the barbarians clamoring at the gates to conquer the world.

The Iraq War is merely another battle in this ancient and never ending war. Now, for the first time ever, the barbarians are about to get nuclear weapons, unless some body prevents them from getting them.

We have four options:

1. We can defeat the Jihad now, before it gets nuclear weapons.

2. We can fight the Jihad later, after it gets nuclear weapons (which may be as early as next year, if Iran's progress on nuclear weapons is what Iran claims it is).

3. We can surrender to the Jihad and accept its dominance in the Middle East now; in Europe in the next few years or decades, and ultimately in America.

OR

4. We can stand down now, and pick up the fight later when the Jihad is more widespread and better armed, perhaps after the Jihad has dominated France and Germany and possibly most of the rest of Europe. It will, of course, be more dangerous, more expensive, and much bloodier.

If you oppose this war, I hope you like the idea that your children, or grandchildren, may live in an Islamic America under the Mullahs and the Sharia, an America that resembles Iran today.

The history of the world is the history of civilization clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.

Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.

Remember, perspective is every thing, and America's schools teach too little history for perspective to be clear, especially in the young American mind.

The Cold War lasted from about 1947 at least until the Berlin Wall came down in 1989; forty-two years!

Europe spent the first half of the 19th century fighting Napoleon, and from 1870 to 1945 fighting Germany!

World War II began in 1928, lasted 17 years, plus a ten year occupation, and the US still has troops in Germany and Japan. World War II resulted in the death of more than 50,000,000 people, maybe more than 100,000,000 people, depending on which estimates you accept.

The US has taken more than 3,000 killed in action in Iraq. The US took more than 4,000 killed in action on the morning of June 6, 1944, the first day of the Normandy Invasion to rid Europe of Nazi Imperialism.

In WW II the US averaged 2,000 KIA a week-for four years. Most of the individual battles of WW II lost more Americans than the entire Iraq war has done so far.

The stakes are at least as high. . A world dominated by representative governments with civil rights, human rights, and personal freedoms . . . Or a world dominated by a radical Islamic Wahhabi movement, by the Jihad, under the Mullahs and the Sharia (Islamic law).

It's difficult to understand why the average American does not grasp this. They favor human rights, civil rights, liberty and freedom, but evidently not for Iraqis.

"Peace Activists" always seem to demonstrate here in America, where it's safe.

Why don't we see Peace Activist demonstrating in Iran, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, North Korea, in the places that really need peace activism the most? I'll tell you why! They would be killed!

The liberal mentality is supposed to favor human rights, civil rights, democracy, multiculturalism, diversity, etc., but if the Jihad wins, wherever the Jihad wins, it is the end of civil rights, human rights, democracy, multiculturalism, diversity, etc.

Americans who oppose the liberation of Iraq are coming down on the side of their own worst enemy!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Not seen on TV

Check out this site: The Middle East Media Research Institute.

Find out what the Islamofascists are saying to the faithful.  Then ask yourself why you don't see this on our beloved mainstream media. 

On second thought, never mind.   You already know.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Vietnam.........it ain't.

The following chart is from AppealforCourage.org.  "Appeal for Courage is a non-partisan, grass-roots effort to communicate to Congress the troops' desire to remain in Iraq until our mission is complete. We feel calls to retreat embolden our enemy and hurt our support within the American public and Iraqi people. "  So this data is from the "boots in Iraq", not some suit in Washington amrchair quarterbacking from the comfort of his posh office.

U.S. Deaths in Vietnam and Iraq
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reality Check

Just needed to chime in and get this off my chest.  I came to the realization over the weekend that with all the Democrats glorification of Barack Obama without him having done anything other than give a good speech at the 2004 Democratic convention, we conservatives (I won't say Republican cuz I'm an indie) shouldn't do the same thing with Fred Thompson.  I realize he's becoming the poster child and I've written elsewhere on this blog that I wish he'd run and I'm currently rooting for him, but I'm not coronating him just yet.  He still has to earn my vote like everyone else.  My other front-runners, however unlikely their election, are Huckabee and Hunter.  Not ruling out Romney either.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Anyone Remember "The Iraqi Liberation Act"?

Charles Krauthammer made a very good point in his latest article, The Myths of War. 

Tenet also makes what he thinks is the damning and sensational charge that the administration, led by Vice President Cheney, had been focusing on Iraq even before 9/11. In fact, he reports, Cheney asked for a CIA briefing on Iraq for the president even before they had been sworn in.

This is odd? This is news? For the entire decade following the 1990 invasion of Kuwait, Iraq was the single greatest threat in the region and therefore the most important focus of U.S. policy. U.N. resolutions, congressional debates and foreign policy arguments were seized with the Iraq question and its many post-Gulf War complications -- the WMDs, the inspection regimes, the cease-fire violations, the no-fly zones, the progressive weakening of sanctions.

Iraq was such an obsession of the Clinton administration that Clinton ultimately ordered an air and missile attack on its WMD installations that lasted four days. This was less than two years before Bush won the presidency. Is it odd that the administration following Clinton's should share its extreme concern about Iraq and its weapons?"

Other writers have made this point as well about the Democrats hypocrisy regarding Iraq prior to Bush taking office.  The GOP made a very compelling video a while back using actual footage of what they said back in the day.  Click HERE to watch it.  Point is, if Bush lied us into Iraq, then what were the Democrats even talking about in that video?  Were THEY lying then?  Were the world's other intelligence agencies lying when they said Saddam had WMD?  Was the U.N.?  Was SADDAM HUSSEIN when we went around telling everyone he did?

What I wish more columnists would mention is The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998.  (Link is to the statement by the President announcing his signature of the Act into law.  Let's see, who was President back in 1998 again?)

The point is, regime change in Iraq has been U.S. POLICY since 1998.  It took 9/11 and George W. Bush to do anything about it.  Yes, I know Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.  This war isn't solely about 9/11 and never was.  It's about wiping out terrorism and extremist Islam and bringing that region out of the dark ages.  While I don't agree with Bush on a number of issues (immigration, massive government spending, etc.) I do support him in this effort.  He said it'd be fought like no other war, take a long time, and wouldn't be confined to one country.  He was right.  I have a book at  home that lists every speech given by Bush regarding the fight against terrorism since 9/11 and up until Operation Iraqi Freedom.   It's called We Will Prevail.  I suggest you look it over.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Run, Fred, Run!

Got this from my friends at www.fred08.com :

Who: Senator Fred Thompson

What: Key Note Speech

Where: Lincoln Club Dinner, Orange County, California

Date: Friday, May 4, 2007

Time: 11:30 p.m. est

Coverage: C-SPAN will cover the speech live!


I think we all know Fred's going to run by now, just waiting for the formal announcement.  Obviously, he timed this to coincide with last night's Republican debate at the Reagan Library.  He's kind of doing the same thing Gingrich is doing, advertising himself and putting his ideas out there without formally announcing a candidacy.  As John Fund of OpinionJournal.com said this week:

     "
Everyone agrees on the negatives of being a noncandidate. Rivals scoop up cash, campaign talent and endorsements while noncandidates sit and wait. But for the already well-known, there are advantages to being "outside the ring." While official candidates are scrutinized relentlessly for gaffes and battered by "independent" opposition groups, noncandidates can be selective in their media exposure and appear high-minded."

Also, the Wall Street Journal Report will be talking about Fred Thompson this Saturday. 
The program airs on FOX News Channel Saturday at 11 p.m. Eastern Time and again Sunday at 6 a.m.

And of course, Fred's columns can be found here on Townhall.com at http://www.townhall.com/columnists/FredThompson/


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I'm mad as hell, and I'm not going to take it anymore!!!

Okay, if you're reading this (and why would you be with as little as I post, first post in MONTHS) and you're a conservative FIRST and Republican second, chances are you feel like I do.  But rather than go on and on, I'll just point you to someone who says it better than I probably could.  Reading this post is what prompted me to start this blog up again.  I can't find much to argue about in here.

Right now I'm signing up for MORE newsletters, podcasts, bookmarking conservative websites in an effort to stay more informed and to try and find a way to get more involved.  Blogging isn't enough,and besides everyone is doing it.  Calling  your representative is a joke.  I write letters to the editor, or I DID, before the editors at the Houston Chronicle started blocking me.  Got sick of me I guess.  I just feel the need to volunteer at my local USO.  Or getting involved in a conservative think tank or something like that.  I'm not interested in volunteering at my local Republican part headquarters because I despise party politics.  (check the link)

I'll just use this as a means of purging my brain because there are too many things rattling around in there.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Welcome to World War Three

This being my first post to my new blog (until I get back in the writing groove) will be a cartoon I want you to look at regarding the history of the middle east in about 2 minutes.  Those of you with A.D.D. should thank me.

The History of the Middle East... In a Couple of Minutes.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »